<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 319 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34140</link>
    <description>The court ruled that bottling of liquor is considered an integral part of the manufacturing process and not merely a packaging activity, as per Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. The decision in a previous case was overruled, and it was held that bottling and packaging of liquor fall within the definition of manufacture and are not subject to Service Tax under Section 65(76b) of the Finance Act. The case was referred to the Division Bench for final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 319 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34140</link>
      <description>The court ruled that bottling of liquor is considered an integral part of the manufacturing process and not merely a packaging activity, as per Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. The decision in a previous case was overruled, and it was held that bottling and packaging of liquor fall within the definition of manufacture and are not subject to Service Tax under Section 65(76b) of the Finance Act. The case was referred to the Division Bench for final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>