https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309985 Anticipatory bail should not be cancelled unless there is material showing interference with investigation, abuse of the concession, or a bail order that is perverse because it ignores relevant material or relies on irrelevant considerations. On the facts examined only at a prima facie stage, the allegations did not show concrete obstruction of the investigation, and the asserted need for custodial interrogation or alleged threats was unsupported by sufficient material. The absence of a hearing to the Public Prosecutor, by itself, did not justify cancellation. The cancellation orders were set aside and the anticipatory bail was restored subject to the Sessions Judge's conditions. en-us Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Sep 2023 18:49:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309985 Anticipatory bail should not be cancelled unless there is material showing interference with investigation, abuse of the concession, or a bail order that is perverse because it ignores relevant material or relies on irrelevant considerations. On the facts examined only at a prima facie stage, the allegations did not show concrete obstruction of the investigation, and the asserted need for custodial interrogation or alleged threats was unsupported by sufficient material. The absence of a hearing to the Public Prosecutor, by itself, did not justify cancellation. The cancellation orders were set aside and the anticipatory bail was restored subject to the Sessions Judge's conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309985