<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 182 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration of penalty waiver under Section 80 of the Finance Act, emphasizing that waiver should be based on genuine reasons for non-payment and prompt rectification, not just timing of tax payment before notice. The case highlighted the importance of proving reasonable cause for tax non-payment to qualify for penalty waiver under Section 80.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 182 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration of penalty waiver under Section 80 of the Finance Act, emphasizing that waiver should be based on genuine reasons for non-payment and prompt rectification, not just timing of tax payment before notice. The case highlighted the importance of proving reasonable cause for tax non-payment to qualify for penalty waiver under Section 80.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>