<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1315 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the disallowance of the deduction claimed for income received from Duty Draw Back Scheme and MEIS under section 80IB(11A) of the Income Tax Act. This decision aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in M/s. Saraf Exports, clarifying that such income is not eligible for deduction as it is not derived from the industrial undertaking.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1315 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the disallowance of the deduction claimed for income received from Duty Draw Back Scheme and MEIS under section 80IB(11A) of the Income Tax Act. This decision aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in M/s. Saraf Exports, clarifying that such income is not eligible for deduction as it is not derived from the industrial undertaking.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>