https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443686 The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed in a case involving the addition of Rs. 2,30,30,522 as unexplained investment, totaling mistake in the Valuation Report, deduction of cost for electrical installations, variation in CPWD and local rates, and deduction for self-supervision. The CIT(A) granted relief on various grounds, partly allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal upheld some decisions while dismissing others, ultimately partially allowing the Revenue's appeal. The judgment was pronounced on 17th July 2023. en-us Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443686 The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed in a case involving the addition of Rs. 2,30,30,522 as unexplained investment, totaling mistake in the Valuation Report, deduction of cost for electrical installations, variation in CPWD and local rates, and deduction for self-supervision. The CIT(A) granted relief on various grounds, partly allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal upheld some decisions while dismissing others, ultimately partially allowing the Revenue's appeal. The judgment was pronounced on 17th July 2023. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443686