https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443675 The court directed the respondents to evaluate the petitioner's representation for provisional release of seized goods under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, within six weeks. The court emphasized compliance with the law and did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's contentions, leaving the decision to the respondents. The writ petitions were disposed of with a directive for timely consideration of the representation without imposing costs. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Sep 2023 07:41:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443675 The court directed the respondents to evaluate the petitioner's representation for provisional release of seized goods under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, within six weeks. The court emphasized compliance with the law and did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's contentions, leaving the decision to the respondents. The writ petitions were disposed of with a directive for timely consideration of the representation without imposing costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443675