<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1293 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443671</link>
    <description>Government dues not admitted in the insolvency or liquidation claim framework cannot survive liquidation sale and cannot be enforced against a bona fide purchaser from the liquidator. Applying Sections 52 and 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, together with the clean slate principle and the Code&#039;s overriding effect, the Court held that the State&#039;s asserted tax charge ranked within the statutory waterfall and could not override the sale. The revenue authorities also could not insist on that charge as a condition for mutation, where the sale deed excluded prior governmental dues. The purchaser was therefore entitled to certification of the revenue entry and deletion of the consequential charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1293 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443671</link>
      <description>Government dues not admitted in the insolvency or liquidation claim framework cannot survive liquidation sale and cannot be enforced against a bona fide purchaser from the liquidator. Applying Sections 52 and 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, together with the clean slate principle and the Code&#039;s overriding effect, the Court held that the State&#039;s asserted tax charge ranked within the statutory waterfall and could not override the sale. The revenue authorities also could not insist on that charge as a condition for mutation, where the sale deed excluded prior governmental dues. The purchaser was therefore entitled to certification of the revenue entry and deletion of the consequential charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>