<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 205 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34129</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition with costs, emphasizing the conclusive nature of the Tax Recovery Officer&#039;s decision on the attachment order, the auction sale of the property to a third party not impleaded in the petition, and the intentional concealment of material facts regarding previous court judgments. The court stressed the importance of disclosing all relevant judgments and parties in legal proceedings for a fair assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 205 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34129</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition with costs, emphasizing the conclusive nature of the Tax Recovery Officer&#039;s decision on the attachment order, the auction sale of the property to a third party not impleaded in the petition, and the intentional concealment of material facts regarding previous court judgments. The court stressed the importance of disclosing all relevant judgments and parties in legal proceedings for a fair assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>