<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1275 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443653</link>
    <description>A Will is validly proved only when it complies with the formal requirements of execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and at least one attesting witness proves execution under Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The propounder must also show that the testator acted of his own free will, in a sound disposing state of mind, with knowledge of the contents and effect of the Will. Where suspicious circumstances arise, they must be removed by cogent evidence; if reliable evidence shows due execution and no genuine suspicion, the Will stands proved and concurrent findings of validity ordinarily do not call for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 21:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1275 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443653</link>
      <description>A Will is validly proved only when it complies with the formal requirements of execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and at least one attesting witness proves execution under Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The propounder must also show that the testator acted of his own free will, in a sound disposing state of mind, with knowledge of the contents and effect of the Will. Where suspicious circumstances arise, they must be removed by cogent evidence; if reliable evidence shows due execution and no genuine suspicion, the Will stands proved and concurrent findings of validity ordinarily do not call for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>