<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 180 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34126</link>
    <description>Unutilized Cenvat credit may be refunded in cash where a manufacturer has closed the factory, surrendered the excise licence, and exited the credit scheme, because Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 does not expressly bar such refund. Applying that principle, the Tribunal sustained the order granting cash refund and rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 180 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34126</link>
      <description>Unutilized Cenvat credit may be refunded in cash where a manufacturer has closed the factory, surrendered the excise licence, and exited the credit scheme, because Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 does not expressly bar such refund. Applying that principle, the Tribunal sustained the order granting cash refund and rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>