https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309962 Note 3 to Rule 5 of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules was treated as governing the computation of direct-recruitment vacancies by applying the prescribed ratio to cadre strength, and not merely to existing vacancies. On that basis, the Special Rules were held not to displace the amended General Rules where the latter clearly removed ambiguity in the recruitment method. The 1992 amendment was also held to apply to selections completed after its commencement, because a candidate in a select list does not acquire a vested right to appointment contrary to the rules then in force. The amendment was therefore upheld as applicable to the selection process. en-us Thu, 13 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:19:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309962 Note 3 to Rule 5 of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules was treated as governing the computation of direct-recruitment vacancies by applying the prescribed ratio to cadre strength, and not merely to existing vacancies. On that basis, the Special Rules were held not to displace the amended General Rules where the latter clearly removed ambiguity in the recruitment method. The 1992 amendment was also held to apply to selections completed after its commencement, because a candidate in a select list does not acquire a vested right to appointment contrary to the rules then in force. The amendment was therefore upheld as applicable to the selection process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309962