https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309961 Where special service rules fixed a direct recruitment quota by reference to every fourth substantive vacancy, and later general rules required any prescribed ratio to be applied to cadre strength, the two sets of rules were read harmoniously rather than as inconsistent. The special method was not repugnant to the amended general rule, because the quota had to be maintained against the entire cadre strength and not the vacancies existing at a given time. On that interpretation, the 25:75 recruitment pattern remained valid and vacancy-based computation was rejected. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:07:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309961 Where special service rules fixed a direct recruitment quota by reference to every fourth substantive vacancy, and later general rules required any prescribed ratio to be applied to cadre strength, the two sets of rules were read harmoniously rather than as inconsistent. The special method was not repugnant to the amended general rule, because the quota had to be maintained against the entire cadre strength and not the vacancies existing at a given time. On that interpretation, the 25:75 recruitment pattern remained valid and vacancy-based computation was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309961