<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 326 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34125</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty on the proprietor of the Trading Firm, emphasizing that the order was legally valid and did not raise any significant legal questions for consideration. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that there was no substantial question of law to warrant interference with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 326 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34125</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty on the proprietor of the Trading Firm, emphasizing that the order was legally valid and did not raise any significant legal questions for consideration. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that there was no substantial question of law to warrant interference with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>