<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1271 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443649</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to allow amendments under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, for claiming Service Tax Rebate (STR) based on existing documentary evidence. The Court dismissed the appeals, granting the respondents the benefit of STR for exports during the relevant period. The Court emphasized that compliance with Notification No. 41/2012-ST was met through submission of necessary documents, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:48:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1271 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443649</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to allow amendments under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, for claiming Service Tax Rebate (STR) based on existing documentary evidence. The Court dismissed the appeals, granting the respondents the benefit of STR for exports during the relevant period. The Court emphasized that compliance with Notification No. 41/2012-ST was met through submission of necessary documents, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>