<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1259 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443637</link>
    <description>Limitation for a Section 7 IBC application was held to exclude the period during which SICA proceedings kept the recovery remedy statutorily suspended, because the right to enforce the recovery certificate revived only after that suspension ended. Repeated OTS proposals and part-payments by the corporate debtor were also treated as acknowledgement of a subsisting debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, since an acknowledgement need only show a present debtor-creditor relationship and must be within limitation. On both grounds, the time-bar objection failed and admission of the insolvency application was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 21:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1259 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443637</link>
      <description>Limitation for a Section 7 IBC application was held to exclude the period during which SICA proceedings kept the recovery remedy statutorily suspended, because the right to enforce the recovery certificate revived only after that suspension ended. Repeated OTS proposals and part-payments by the corporate debtor were also treated as acknowledgement of a subsisting debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, since an acknowledgement need only show a present debtor-creditor relationship and must be within limitation. On both grounds, the time-bar objection failed and admission of the insolvency application was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>