<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1247 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443625</link>
    <description>In a Section 138 prosecution based on a cheque drawn by a company, the company must be arraigned as an accused to sustain liability under Section 141; proceedings against persons in charge rest only on vicarious liability. The High Court found no arguable ground to interfere with the acquittal because the company had not been impleaded, and the trial court&#039;s view on that defect was left undisturbed. Leave to appeal was therefore refused and the application rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:47:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1247 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443625</link>
      <description>In a Section 138 prosecution based on a cheque drawn by a company, the company must be arraigned as an accused to sustain liability under Section 141; proceedings against persons in charge rest only on vicarious liability. The High Court found no arguable ground to interfere with the acquittal because the company had not been impleaded, and the trial court&#039;s view on that defect was left undisturbed. Leave to appeal was therefore refused and the application rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>