<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1246 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443624</link>
    <description>The appellate court allowed the appeal, setting aside the acquittal of respondent No. 2, who was found guilty under Section 138 of the N.I Act and sentenced to six months of simple imprisonment and directed to pay compensation of Rs. 36 lakhs. The acquittal of respondent No. 3 was affirmed. The court directed respondent No. 2 to surrender before the trial court to undergo the sentence, with provisions for issuing a warrant if he fails to appear within 10 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 21:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1246 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443624</link>
      <description>The appellate court allowed the appeal, setting aside the acquittal of respondent No. 2, who was found guilty under Section 138 of the N.I Act and sentenced to six months of simple imprisonment and directed to pay compensation of Rs. 36 lakhs. The acquittal of respondent No. 3 was affirmed. The court directed respondent No. 2 to surrender before the trial court to undergo the sentence, with provisions for issuing a warrant if he fails to appear within 10 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>