<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1208 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443586</link>
    <description>An additional legal ground seeking exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was permitted to be taken on record because the plea raised a pure question of law. The respondent did not object to the ground being introduced, and the issue concerned the applicability of an exemption notification rather than disputed facts. On that basis, the miscellaneous application was allowed and the additional ground was accepted for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 21:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1208 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443586</link>
      <description>An additional legal ground seeking exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was permitted to be taken on record because the plea raised a pure question of law. The respondent did not object to the ground being introduced, and the issue concerned the applicability of an exemption notification rather than disputed facts. On that basis, the miscellaneous application was allowed and the additional ground was accepted for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>