<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1581 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309925</link>
    <description>Under the relevant service rules, suspension does not lapse automatically after 90 days merely because no charge-sheet has been issued. Continued suspension remains in force until the competent authority modifies or revokes it, and its legality depends on judicial review of the reasons and surrounding facts. Where allegations are serious and CBI or vigilance investigations are pending or completed, with major penalty proceedings and prosecution contemplated, continuation of suspension may be sustained. The cited authorities were not treated as laying down an absolute rule requiring reinstatement after three months. On those facts, the continued suspension was not held illegal and no interference was called for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 21:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1581 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309925</link>
      <description>Under the relevant service rules, suspension does not lapse automatically after 90 days merely because no charge-sheet has been issued. Continued suspension remains in force until the competent authority modifies or revokes it, and its legality depends on judicial review of the reasons and surrounding facts. Where allegations are serious and CBI or vigilance investigations are pending or completed, with major penalty proceedings and prosecution contemplated, continuation of suspension may be sustained. The cited authorities were not treated as laying down an absolute rule requiring reinstatement after three months. On those facts, the continued suspension was not held illegal and no interference was called for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>