https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309933 Where an arbitral award has been set aside in full and the Section 34 proceeding is no longer pending, the court cannot use Section 34(4) to adjourn the matter for curing defects in the award, and an additional award is inappropriate if neither party has sought that relief. In that situation, a fresh adjudication must proceed de novo, and the court may appoint a substitute arbitrator under Section 11(6) if the agreed arbitral mechanism has failed to secure fair and effective resolution. The court considered departure from the original tribunal justified where the panel lacked judicial expertise and the dispute required effective re-hearing. en-us Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Sep 2023 21:13:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309933 Where an arbitral award has been set aside in full and the Section 34 proceeding is no longer pending, the court cannot use Section 34(4) to adjourn the matter for curing defects in the award, and an additional award is inappropriate if neither party has sought that relief. In that situation, a fresh adjudication must proceed de novo, and the court may appoint a substitute arbitrator under Section 11(6) if the agreed arbitral mechanism has failed to secure fair and effective resolution. The court considered departure from the original tribunal justified where the panel lacked judicial expertise and the dispute required effective re-hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309933