https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309943 Writ jurisdiction was declined where a statutory objection and appeal mechanism was available under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and the petitioner was directed to pursue that remedy to challenge the assessment orders. Because the petitioner claimed non-service of the assessments and first learned of them through the writ of demand, the Court granted limited procedural relief: certified copies were to be obtained and objections under Section 74 filed within two weeks. Pending that exercise, the respondents were restrained from taking coercive action on the impugned demand, and liberty was reserved to approach the competent authority in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Sep 2023 21:13:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309943 Writ jurisdiction was declined where a statutory objection and appeal mechanism was available under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and the petitioner was directed to pursue that remedy to challenge the assessment orders. Because the petitioner claimed non-service of the assessments and first learned of them through the writ of demand, the Court granted limited procedural relief: certified copies were to be obtained and objections under Section 74 filed within two weeks. Pending that exercise, the respondents were restrained from taking coercive action on the impugned demand, and liberty was reserved to approach the competent authority in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309943