<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 321 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34112</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in the case involving mispayment of duty between two manufacturing units, ruling that excess duty paid by one unit could offset the differential duty owed by the other unit under the same manufacturer. The tribunal set aside the demand confirmation and penalty imposition, denying the refund of excess duty paid by one unit. This decision underscores the importance of accurate duty payment allocation between units and the authority&#039;s role in ensuring correct payment and adjustment, emphasizing the repercussions of payment errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 321 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34112</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in the case involving mispayment of duty between two manufacturing units, ruling that excess duty paid by one unit could offset the differential duty owed by the other unit under the same manufacturer. The tribunal set aside the demand confirmation and penalty imposition, denying the refund of excess duty paid by one unit. This decision underscores the importance of accurate duty payment allocation between units and the authority&#039;s role in ensuring correct payment and adjustment, emphasizing the repercussions of payment errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>