<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2036 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309950</link>
    <description>Order I Rule 10(2) CPC empowers the court to add or strike out parties to enable complete adjudication, and Order XXIII Rule 1-A CPC permits a defendant to seek transposition as plaintiff on withdrawal of the suit where a substantial question remains against other defendants. On the stated facts, the transposed defendants retained a live interest in the challenge to the sale deed and a claim against the other defendants, so their right to continue was not lost by the original plaintiffs&#039; withdrawal. The transposition of defendants Nos. 3 to 6 as plaintiffs was valid, and the challenge to that order failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2036 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309950</link>
      <description>Order I Rule 10(2) CPC empowers the court to add or strike out parties to enable complete adjudication, and Order XXIII Rule 1-A CPC permits a defendant to seek transposition as plaintiff on withdrawal of the suit where a substantial question remains against other defendants. On the stated facts, the transposed defendants retained a live interest in the challenge to the sale deed and a claim against the other defendants, so their right to continue was not lost by the original plaintiffs&#039; withdrawal. The transposition of defendants Nos. 3 to 6 as plaintiffs was valid, and the challenge to that order failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>