<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 179 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34111</link>
    <description>ST-5 form appeals were treated as maintainable in a dispute over denial of Cenvat credit on input services, particularly where an ST-4 appeal had already been entertained by the appellate authority without objection. The Tribunal discharged the show cause notices in favour of the assessee on that procedural footing, while expressly leaving open the merits of whether such demands should be raised under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 179 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34111</link>
      <description>ST-5 form appeals were treated as maintainable in a dispute over denial of Cenvat credit on input services, particularly where an ST-4 appeal had already been entertained by the appellate authority without objection. The Tribunal discharged the show cause notices in favour of the assessee on that procedural footing, while expressly leaving open the merits of whether such demands should be raised under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>