https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34110 The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal's decision to direct the Authority to process a claim for refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, despite the absence of a formal letter to the Department about paying duty under protest. The Court emphasized the significance of the marking on the forms indicating duty paid under protest and ruled that it was sufficient to support the refund claim. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal without awarding costs. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34110 The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal's decision to direct the Authority to process a claim for refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, despite the absence of a formal letter to the Department about paying duty under protest. The Court emphasized the significance of the marking on the forms indicating duty paid under protest and ruled that it was sufficient to support the refund claim. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal without awarding costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34110