<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1621 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309915</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals against the assessment were pending, and the Court noted that the assessment order could not be revived unless the appellant succeeded in those appeals. On that basis, the stay petitions were dismissed. The text reflects a procedural service tax dispute where interim relief was declined because the substantive appeals remained to be decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:19:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1621 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309915</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals against the assessment were pending, and the Court noted that the assessment order could not be revived unless the appellant succeeded in those appeals. On that basis, the stay petitions were dismissed. The text reflects a procedural service tax dispute where interim relief was declined because the substantive appeals remained to be decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>