<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 200 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34108</link>
    <description>In a service tax valuation dispute over commercial and industrial construction service, the appellant sought abatement under Notification No. 15/04-ST and argued that the value of free-supplied cement and steel should not be included in the gross amount charged. The dispute concerned interim relief only, and the merits of the valuation issue were not finally decided. Relying on High Court decisions, the tribunal waived pre-deposit of duty and penalty and allowed the stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 200 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34108</link>
      <description>In a service tax valuation dispute over commercial and industrial construction service, the appellant sought abatement under Notification No. 15/04-ST and argued that the value of free-supplied cement and steel should not be included in the gross amount charged. The dispute concerned interim relief only, and the merits of the valuation issue were not finally decided. Relying on High Court decisions, the tribunal waived pre-deposit of duty and penalty and allowed the stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>