https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34106 Gardening, horticulture, landscaping and beautification activities were treated as prima facie distinct from Interior Decorator Service, so the disputed service tax classification issue favoured the assessee at the interim stage. The tribunal also noted the time-bar challenge and found the case merited protection pending appeal, resulting in waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery until disposal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34106 Gardening, horticulture, landscaping and beautification activities were treated as prima facie distinct from Interior Decorator Service, so the disputed service tax classification issue favoured the assessee at the interim stage. The tribunal also noted the time-bar challenge and found the case merited protection pending appeal, resulting in waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery until disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34106