https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443580 The court held that the Appellant was not liable for reporting an offence committed after goods were cleared from the Customs Station and stored in the bonded warehouse. The court found no violations of specific regulations under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 and 2013. The punitive measures imposed on the Appellant were deemed disproportionate, leading to the revocation of the license and forfeiture of the security deposit being set aside. The court upheld a penalty of Rs. 50,000/- and allowed the Appellant to apply for a new license. The appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant. en-us Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:32:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443580 The court held that the Appellant was not liable for reporting an offence committed after goods were cleared from the Customs Station and stored in the bonded warehouse. The court found no violations of specific regulations under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 and 2013. The punitive measures imposed on the Appellant were deemed disproportionate, leading to the revocation of the license and forfeiture of the security deposit being set aside. The court upheld a penalty of Rs. 50,000/- and allowed the Appellant to apply for a new license. The appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443580