<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1195 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443573</link>
    <description>The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioner (A2) in a case involving prosecution for evasion of service tax due to the absence of sanction specifically granted against the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proper sanction for prosecuting individuals in cases of alleged tax evasion to ensure the validity of legal proceedings and protect the rights of the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:31:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1195 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443573</link>
      <description>The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioner (A2) in a case involving prosecution for evasion of service tax due to the absence of sanction specifically granted against the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proper sanction for prosecuting individuals in cases of alleged tax evasion to ensure the validity of legal proceedings and protect the rights of the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>