<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1192 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, comprising Hon&#039;ble Members P. Dinesha and M. Ajit Kumar, examined the appellant&#039;s appeal against Orders-in-Original confirming tax demands related to the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found that demands under composite contracts pre-June 2007 were unsustainable, emphasizing that Service Tax should only apply to the service component, not the entire declared value. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the demands and the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits, if any, as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1192 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, comprising Hon&#039;ble Members P. Dinesha and M. Ajit Kumar, examined the appellant&#039;s appeal against Orders-in-Original confirming tax demands related to the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found that demands under composite contracts pre-June 2007 were unsustainable, emphasizing that Service Tax should only apply to the service component, not the entire declared value. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the demands and the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits, if any, as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>