https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309898 Writ interference in a non-statutory procurement tender is limited: a court will not ordinarily disturb exclusion from supply unless the decision is arbitrary, mala fide, or contrary to law, and the challenge to the tender-based procurement direction therefore failed. On natural justice, the Court held that the requirement of a prior hearing is context-specific and may be flexible where the impugned action is a regulatory direction tied to tender terms and disclosure of a pending criminal case rather than an adjudication of an independent right. The plea of denial of hearing was rejected, and the procurement restriction was upheld. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:27:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309898 Writ interference in a non-statutory procurement tender is limited: a court will not ordinarily disturb exclusion from supply unless the decision is arbitrary, mala fide, or contrary to law, and the challenge to the tender-based procurement direction therefore failed. On natural justice, the Court held that the requirement of a prior hearing is context-specific and may be flexible where the impugned action is a regulatory direction tied to tender terms and disclosure of a pending criminal case rather than an adjudication of an independent right. The plea of denial of hearing was rejected, and the procurement restriction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309898