https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309902 Repeated failure to use a granted last opportunity for cross-examination, followed by unsupported requests for adjournment, justified closure of the defendants' right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness. The Court treated the conduct as dilatory, noted that no affidavit or material documents supported the further request, and accepted the trial court's refusal to grant additional indulgence. The closure order was upheld because there was no basis to interfere with the trial court's exercise of discretion in managing long-pending proceedings. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:27:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309902 Repeated failure to use a granted last opportunity for cross-examination, followed by unsupported requests for adjournment, justified closure of the defendants' right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness. The Court treated the conduct as dilatory, noted that no affidavit or material documents supported the further request, and accepted the trial court's refusal to grant additional indulgence. The closure order was upheld because there was no basis to interfere with the trial court's exercise of discretion in managing long-pending proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309902