<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1430 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309897</link>
    <description>The Court held that the State could not decline cooperation with the Union and the CBI merely because a Commission of Inquiry had been constituted or a PIL was pending, since Supreme Court directions on the SIT required full governmental assistance. It also reiterated that a CBI investigation under Article 226 is an exceptional measure, but may be ordered where the material discloses a prima facie case and the scale, complexity and public importance of the allegations require an independent probe to maintain credibility and confidence. On the facts, serious corruption-related allegations, suspected laundering through shell companies, and an unsatisfactory local inquiry justified CBI intervention, and a Commission of Inquiry was not a substitute for criminal investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1430 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309897</link>
      <description>The Court held that the State could not decline cooperation with the Union and the CBI merely because a Commission of Inquiry had been constituted or a PIL was pending, since Supreme Court directions on the SIT required full governmental assistance. It also reiterated that a CBI investigation under Article 226 is an exceptional measure, but may be ordered where the material discloses a prima facie case and the scale, complexity and public importance of the allegations require an independent probe to maintain credibility and confidence. On the facts, serious corruption-related allegations, suspected laundering through shell companies, and an unsatisfactory local inquiry justified CBI intervention, and a Commission of Inquiry was not a substitute for criminal investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>