<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 35 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34099</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to include interest on delayed payment, transport expenses, and rectification charges as deductions under Section 80HH. However, the Court set aside the decision on scrap sales, insurance claim, and excess duty refund, remitting the issue of scrap sales back to the Tribunal for further evidence and a new decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 35 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34099</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to include interest on delayed payment, transport expenses, and rectification charges as deductions under Section 80HH. However, the Court set aside the decision on scrap sales, insurance claim, and excess duty refund, remitting the issue of scrap sales back to the Tribunal for further evidence and a new decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>