https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309887 A person who acquires an independent interest in property during the pendency of a suit for specific performance, but was not a party to the sale agreement, is not automatically entitled to be impleaded. Order 22 Rule 10 applies only where there is devolution, assignment or creation of interest in the subject matter of the suit, and an independent decree of co-ownership did not satisfy that requirement on these facts. Order 1 Rule 10(2) turns on whether the person's presence is necessary for complete adjudication; here, no relief was claimed against the respondent and the contractual dispute could be decided between the original parties, so she was neither a necessary nor a proper party. en-us Mon, 24 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Sep 2023 18:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309887 A person who acquires an independent interest in property during the pendency of a suit for specific performance, but was not a party to the sale agreement, is not automatically entitled to be impleaded. Order 22 Rule 10 applies only where there is devolution, assignment or creation of interest in the subject matter of the suit, and an independent decree of co-ownership did not satisfy that requirement on these facts. Order 1 Rule 10(2) turns on whether the person's presence is necessary for complete adjudication; here, no relief was claimed against the respondent and the contractual dispute could be decided between the original parties, so she was neither a necessary nor a proper party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309887