<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 8 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34097</link>
    <description>The Court found that the assessment order passed without a hearing violated principles of natural justice. The Court set aside the assessment order and remanded the matter for a fresh assessment, directing the respondent to provide the petitioner with a hearing opportunity. The petitioner was allowed to raise all issues in the fresh assessment proceedings. The writ petition was allowed, the assessment order was set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 8 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34097</link>
      <description>The Court found that the assessment order passed without a hearing violated principles of natural justice. The Court set aside the assessment order and remanded the matter for a fresh assessment, directing the respondent to provide the petitioner with a hearing opportunity. The petitioner was allowed to raise all issues in the fresh assessment proceedings. The writ petition was allowed, the assessment order was set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>