<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 607 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309883</link>
    <description>In a Section 138 cheque dishonour prosecution, threshold quashing is not appropriate where the complaint, dishonour memo and statutory notice prima facie disclose the statutory ingredients; defences such as a signed blank cheque allegedly handed to a third party must be tested at trial with the presumption under Section 139. Alleged breaches of income-tax, contract or money-lending law do not, by themselves, bar the prosecution if Section 138 ingredients are otherwise made out. An express recital that the cheque was issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt is not indispensable where the complaint, notice and surrounding circumstances sufficiently disclose liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 607 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309883</link>
      <description>In a Section 138 cheque dishonour prosecution, threshold quashing is not appropriate where the complaint, dishonour memo and statutory notice prima facie disclose the statutory ingredients; defences such as a signed blank cheque allegedly handed to a third party must be tested at trial with the presumption under Section 139. Alleged breaches of income-tax, contract or money-lending law do not, by themselves, bar the prosecution if Section 138 ingredients are otherwise made out. An express recital that the cheque was issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt is not indispensable where the complaint, notice and surrounding circumstances sufficiently disclose liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>