https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34096 The judgment addressed conflicting opinions on the recovery of service tax beyond three years, leading to a referral to a larger bench for clarity. It discussed the interpretation of relevant Acts, highlighted the powers of the Appellate Tribunal, and emphasized the President's authority to refer cases to ensure judicial discipline. The importance of maintaining discipline and resolving differences within the Tribunal was underscored, with a directive to refer the case to a larger bench for resolution, aiming to uphold the integrity of the judicial process. en-us Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34096 The judgment addressed conflicting opinions on the recovery of service tax beyond three years, leading to a referral to a larger bench for clarity. It discussed the interpretation of relevant Acts, highlighted the powers of the Appellate Tribunal, and emphasized the President's authority to refer cases to ensure judicial discipline. The importance of maintaining discipline and resolving differences within the Tribunal was underscored, with a directive to refer the case to a larger bench for resolution, aiming to uphold the integrity of the judicial process. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34096