<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 33 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34095</link>
    <description>The case dealt with the applicability of a service provider exemption to a manufacturer of CTD bars in relation to the transport of goods by road. The assessee, as the service recipient, claimed benefits under specific notifications but faced disallowance by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to insufficient documentation. Despite producing photocopies of consignment notes, the benefit was denied. The Tribunal granted a remand, emphasizing the need for proper verification of original documents to ensure compliance with notification conditions before extending benefits. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration based on the importance of accurate verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 33 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34095</link>
      <description>The case dealt with the applicability of a service provider exemption to a manufacturer of CTD bars in relation to the transport of goods by road. The assessee, as the service recipient, claimed benefits under specific notifications but faced disallowance by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to insufficient documentation. Despite producing photocopies of consignment notes, the benefit was denied. The Tribunal granted a remand, emphasizing the need for proper verification of original documents to ensure compliance with notification conditions before extending benefits. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration based on the importance of accurate verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>