<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1165 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in a case involving reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to alleged bogus purchases by a respondent-company. The Tribunal found procedural flaws, including the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on unverified information and a witness statement without allowing cross-examination. Emphasizing the importance of proper verification and adherence to legal procedures, the Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s appeal, highlighting inconsistencies in the AO&#039;s approach and questioning the validity of reassessment based on minor discrepancies in invoices. The appeal by the revenue was subsequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:18:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1165 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in a case involving reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to alleged bogus purchases by a respondent-company. The Tribunal found procedural flaws, including the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on unverified information and a witness statement without allowing cross-examination. Emphasizing the importance of proper verification and adherence to legal procedures, the Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s appeal, highlighting inconsistencies in the AO&#039;s approach and questioning the validity of reassessment based on minor discrepancies in invoices. The appeal by the revenue was subsequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>