<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1143 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443521</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the grounds of arrest were duly informed to the petitioner, complying with legal requirements under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and Article 22(1) of the Constitution. The petitioner&#039;s fundamental rights were not found to be violated as he was informed of the grounds of arrest and had the opportunity to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1143 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443521</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the grounds of arrest were duly informed to the petitioner, complying with legal requirements under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and Article 22(1) of the Constitution. The petitioner&#039;s fundamental rights were not found to be violated as he was informed of the grounds of arrest and had the opportunity to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>