<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1136 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant correctly applied the formula under Rule 6 (3 A) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The appellant was deemed eligible for recredit of the excess amount reversed on common input services used in electricity production. The Tribunal did not find it necessary to address the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on the reversed amount, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:16:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1136 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant correctly applied the formula under Rule 6 (3 A) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The appellant was deemed eligible for recredit of the excess amount reversed on common input services used in electricity production. The Tribunal did not find it necessary to address the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on the reversed amount, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>