<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 204 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309864</link>
    <description>Later judicial remand does not by itself cure an earlier arrest or detention that breached the mandatory safeguards on disclosure of grounds of arrest and prompt production before a Magistrate under Article 22 and Section 50 CrPC. The legality of detention must be tested on the contemporaneous arrest and remand record, and habeas corpus relief may still lie where compliance is not shown. On the facts recorded, relief was granted only in Sher Bahadur Singh&#039;s case because the arrest and remand were not satisfactorily proved; the remaining petitioners were refused relief because the records showed disclosure of grounds and lawful remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 204 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309864</link>
      <description>Later judicial remand does not by itself cure an earlier arrest or detention that breached the mandatory safeguards on disclosure of grounds of arrest and prompt production before a Magistrate under Article 22 and Section 50 CrPC. The legality of detention must be tested on the contemporaneous arrest and remand record, and habeas corpus relief may still lie where compliance is not shown. On the facts recorded, relief was granted only in Sher Bahadur Singh&#039;s case because the arrest and remand were not satisfactorily proved; the remaining petitioners were refused relief because the records showed disclosure of grounds and lawful remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>