https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309862 Grounds of arrest must be assessed on the record in each case, and where the affidavits and materials showed communication at arrest, non-compliance with Section 50(1) CrPC and Article 22(1) was not established. Habeas corpus was held unavailable where the detainees were already in custody under valid remand orders passed by competent courts, because detention is tested at the time of hearing and an alleged arrest irregularity does not by itself justify release. The Court also construed Section 209(b) CrPC as authorising committal remand until conclusion of trial, so no fresh remand was needed merely because proceedings later fell within Section 309(2). en-us Wed, 18 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:52:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309862 Grounds of arrest must be assessed on the record in each case, and where the affidavits and materials showed communication at arrest, non-compliance with Section 50(1) CrPC and Article 22(1) was not established. Habeas corpus was held unavailable where the detainees were already in custody under valid remand orders passed by competent courts, because detention is tested at the time of hearing and an alleged arrest irregularity does not by itself justify release. The Court also construed Section 209(b) CrPC as authorising committal remand until conclusion of trial, so no fresh remand was needed merely because proceedings later fell within Section 309(2). Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309862