https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309861 Preventive detention under constitutional procedural safeguards was treated as substantially compliant where written intimation of detention was given and the place of detention was conveyed orally to a family member, because the purpose of enabling prompt action by relatives was achieved in substance. The Court also found that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was supported by material showing bootlegging activities creating terror, requiring police deployment, and disturbing the locality, thereby affecting public order. On that basis, the detention order was upheld and the challenge failed. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:33:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309861 Preventive detention under constitutional procedural safeguards was treated as substantially compliant where written intimation of detention was given and the place of detention was conveyed orally to a family member, because the purpose of enabling prompt action by relatives was achieved in substance. The Court also found that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was supported by material showing bootlegging activities creating terror, requiring police deployment, and disturbing the locality, thereby affecting public order. On that basis, the detention order was upheld and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309861