<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (11) TMI 23 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309860</link>
    <description>Explanation I to Section 8 of the Madras Agriculturists&#039; Relief Act, 1938 applies only to payments that remain open and unappropriated on the relevant date; it prevents a creditor from unilaterally applying such payments to interest unless the debtor has made an express written statement. The provision was meant to override general-law rules allowing creditor-driven appropriation of open payments, but it does not disturb cases where the parties have already settled accounts, the debtor has appropriated the payments in that settlement, and a fresh promissory note has been executed. Accordingly, payments merged in a prior settlement cannot be reopened and treated as credits towards principal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (11) TMI 23 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309860</link>
      <description>Explanation I to Section 8 of the Madras Agriculturists&#039; Relief Act, 1938 applies only to payments that remain open and unappropriated on the relevant date; it prevents a creditor from unilaterally applying such payments to interest unless the debtor has made an express written statement. The provision was meant to override general-law rules allowing creditor-driven appropriation of open payments, but it does not disturb cases where the parties have already settled accounts, the debtor has appropriated the payments in that settlement, and a fresh promissory note has been executed. Accordingly, payments merged in a prior settlement cannot be reopened and treated as credits towards principal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>