<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34088</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Writ Petition, granting the petitioner a month to make the required payment as demanded by the second respondent. The court emphasized the importance of following legal procedures, appealing against orders, and complying with court directives in financial matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34088</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Writ Petition, granting the petitioner a month to make the required payment as demanded by the second respondent. The court emphasized the importance of following legal procedures, appealing against orders, and complying with court directives in financial matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>