<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1810 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309859</link>
    <description>Grant of pardon under Section 306 CrPC is a judicial act, not a mechanical response to prosecutorial support. The court must apply its mind to the approver&#039;s complicity, the nature of the evidence likely to be given, the relative culpability of co-accused, and the interests of justice, including fair-trial and public-policy considerations. The settled position under the old Code and the 1973 Code was reaffirmed, with approver evidence remaining subject to caution. On the facts, the High Court&#039;s interference with the Special Judge&#039;s order was held not justified, and the order quashing the pardon and remitting the matter was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1810 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309859</link>
      <description>Grant of pardon under Section 306 CrPC is a judicial act, not a mechanical response to prosecutorial support. The court must apply its mind to the approver&#039;s complicity, the nature of the evidence likely to be given, the relative culpability of co-accused, and the interests of justice, including fair-trial and public-policy considerations. The settled position under the old Code and the 1973 Code was reaffirmed, with approver evidence remaining subject to caution. On the facts, the High Court&#039;s interference with the Special Judge&#039;s order was held not justified, and the order quashing the pardon and remitting the matter was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>