https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309856 The Privy Council upheld the decision of the High Court of Bombay, ruling that the murderer, Hanmappa, was disqualified from inheriting the estate after murdering Chanbasava. Hanmappa could not succeed to the estate, and any title claimed through him was rejected. The legal estate was held to be disqualified from the murderer, and the heirship was traced directly to Parappa. The judgment emphasized the application of legal principles, equity, and established customs in determining inheritance rights among family members. en-us Thu, 19 Jun 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:28:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309856 The Privy Council upheld the decision of the High Court of Bombay, ruling that the murderer, Hanmappa, was disqualified from inheriting the estate after murdering Chanbasava. Hanmappa could not succeed to the estate, and any title claimed through him was rejected. The legal estate was held to be disqualified from the murderer, and the heirship was traced directly to Parappa. The judgment emphasized the application of legal principles, equity, and established customs in determining inheritance rights among family members. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Jun 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309856